Uporaba spletnih panelov v anketni metodologiji, 2016: Sistematični pregled
Osnovne informacije o raziskavi
ADP - IDNo: ONPANR16
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_ONPANR16_V1
Glavni avtor(ji):
Izdelal datoteko podatkov:
Respi, Chiara - Oddelek za sociologijo in družboslovno raziskovanje, Univerza Milano-BicoccaLozar Manfreda, Katja - Fakulteta za družbene vede, Univerza v Ljubljani
Kraj; datum:
Milano, Italija, Ljubljana, Slovenija; 2016
Finančna podpora:
Financiranje iz lastnih sredstev.
Številka projekta:
ni podatka
Vsebina raziskave
Ključne besede ADP: reference, ki se nanašajo na spletne panele, izbira študij o spletnih panelih, spletni paneli v anketni metodologiji, sistematični pregled raziskav spletnih panelov
Ključne besede ELSST:
METODOLOGIJA
Vsebinska področja CESSDA
DRUGO
Vsebinsko področja CERIF
Raziskovalna metodologija v znanosti
Vsebinska področja ADP
REFERENCE
PANEL
KAKOVOST PANELNIH PODATKOV
RAZISKAVA
RAZISKOVALNA VPRAŠANJA PANELA
Povzetek:
Študija je sistematični pregled, katerega cilj je oceniti (i) značilnosti spletnih panelov, ki se uporabljajo v anketni metodologiji, (ii) kakovost teh spletnih panelov, (iii) značilnosti posameznih študij panela in (iv) uporabo spletnih panelov kot vzorčnega vira za raziskave o kakovosti anketnih podatkov. Za izbor empiričnih študij s področja anketne metodologije, ki se nanašajo na spletne panele, je bila uporabljena bibliografska baza podatkov WebSM. Za obravnavo raziskovalnih vprašanj so bile za opis značilnosti spletnih panelov, kakor tudi namena uporabe spletnih panelov, definirane specifične kodirane kategorije. V povezavi z namenom študije so bili kodirani različni vidiki kvalitete panelnih podatkov za študije o kvaliteti samih panelov, kakor tudi metodološka vprašanja za študije, ki uporabljajo panele kot vzorčni vir za raziskave anketne metodologije.
Metodologija
| Čas zbiranja podatkov: | 6. oktober 2016, 8. november 2016 |
|---|---|
| Čas izdelave: | 2016 |
| Država: | ni podatka |
| Geografsko pokritje: | ni podatka |
| Enota za analizo: |
Drugo Referenca Spletni panel Posamezna študija spletnega panela |
| Populacija: |
Vsi članki in poglavja iz knjig zabeleženih v WebSM bibliografski podatkovni bazi, ki so bili objavljeni med januarjem 2012 in junijem 2016, so napisani v angleškem jeziku in v naslovu vsebujejo vsaj eno ključno besedo: panel, verjetnost, ne-verjetnost, neverjetnost, utež, rezultat in reprezentativnost. |
| Izključeni: | ni podatka |
| Zbiranje podatkov je opravil: |
Respi, Chiara |
| Tip vzorca: |
Zajeta celotna populacija Iz bibliografske podatkovne baze WebSM so bile izbrane reference, ki so bile razvrščene v tri na novo oblikovane podatkovne baze. Le-te so vsebovale kodirane značilnosti spletnih panelov, ki so jih navajale pridobljene reference. V bibliografski bazi podatkov WebSM so bili v iskalno polje najprej vpisani splošni kriteriji vključitve, in sicer: članek / poglavje v knjigi, objavljeno od januarja 2012 do junija 2016 ter celotno besedilo v angleščini. Tako je bila pridobljena zbirka 847 najnovejših objavljenih referenc s področja spletne anketne metodologije. Dodatno je bilo v zbirko vključenih še 9 referenc t. j. 6 poglavij iz knjige avtorja Das et al., 2011, ki sicer ne ustreza kriteriju datuma objave, vendar se poglavja izrecno nanašajo na spletne panele ter 3 objavljeni članki, ki so jih navajale pridobljene reference oz. s pomočjo interneta. Tako je bilo končno število identificiranih referenc 856. Po odstranitvi 4 podvojenih zapisov (iz pridobljenega WebSM izbora) je bil uporabljen poseben kriterij vključitve, tj. vsebovanje vsaj ene od sedmih ključnih besed: panel, verjetnost, ne-verjetnost, neverjetnost, utež, rezultat in reprezentativnost v naslovu reference. Kriterij je botroval izločitvi 762 referenc. V zadnjem koraku je bilo na preostalih 90 referencah opravljeno preverjanje upravičenosti preko ocenjevanja povzetka in celotnega besedila. Najprej je bil pregledan povzetek, da bi ugotovili ali je raziskava ustrezala določeni temi, če ni, je bila referenca izključena. Potem je bilo pregledano celotno besedilo in sprejeta je bila odločitev, ali naj se le-ta vključi oz. izključi. Glavni razlog za neupravičenost so bile spletne ankete, ki so potekale brez panelnih članov, uporaba ne spletnih panelov in teoretični prispevki, ki so preučevali spletne panele brez predstavitve empiričnih dokazov o njihovi uporabi in kakovosti. Izključenih je bilo 16 referenc, pri čemer je bilo v sistematični pregled vključenih 74 referenc. |
| Način zbiranja podatkov: |
Kodiranje vsebine |
| Uteževanje: |
Brez uteževanja. |
Omejitve dostopa
Podatkovna datoteka je uporabnikom dostopna brez registracije pod mednarodno licenco Creative Commons 0. Uporabnik se zaveže, da bo skrbel za tajnost podatkov in opravljal analize brez poskusov identifikacije posameznikov ter spoštoval profesionalne etične kodekse. Avtorske pravice pridržane. Arhiv izroča podatke uporabnikom samo za namen, ki ga posebej opredelijo, ob zagotovitvi spoštovanja profesionalnih etičnih kodeksov. Uporabnik se posebej zaveže, da bo skrbel za tajnost podatkov in opravljal analize brez poskusov identifikacije posameznika.
Kontakt: Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov
Pri objavah, ki bi sledile na podlagi podatkov, je potrebno polno citirati avtorja in Arhiv.
Vsak uporabnik je dolžan opozoriti na morebitne pomanjkljivosti gradiva in poslati Arhivu 2 kopiji nastalih besedil.
Uporabnik naj pred uporabo pozorno prebere spremljajočo dokumentacijo in se v primeru nejasnosti obrne na avtorje raziskave ali Arhiv.
Osnovne informacije o datoteki podatkov
Naslov podatkovne datoteke: Usage of online panels in survey methodology field, 2016: A systematic review - reference [Podatkovna datoteka]
ID datoteke: F1
Avtor podatkovne datoteke: Respi, Chiara; Lozar Manfreda, Katja
Format: *.txt - TEKST
- število spremenljivk: 11
- število enot: 74
Licenca: cc0
Verzija: 12. september 2019
Naslov podatkovne datoteke: Usage of online panels in survey methodology field, 2016: A systematic review - panel [Podatkovna datoteka]
ID datoteke: F2
Avtor podatkovne datoteke: Respi, Chiara; Lozar Manfreda, Katja
Format: *.txt - TEKST
- število spremenljivk: 52
- število enot: 113
Licenca: cc0
Verzija: 12. september 2019
Naslov podatkovne datoteke: Usage of online panels in survey methodology field, 2016: A systematic review - individual panel study [Podatkovna datoteka]
ID datoteke: F3
Avtor podatkovne datoteke: Respi, Chiara; Lozar Manfreda, Katja
Format: *.txt - TEKST
- število spremenljivk: 25
- število enot: 118
Licenca: cc0
Verzija: 12. september 2019
Naslov podatkovne datoteke: Usage of online panels in survey methodology field, 2016: A systematic review. Complete answers [Podatkovna datoteka]
ID datoteke: F4
Avtor podatkovne datoteke: Respi, Chiara; Lozar Manfreda, Katja
Format: *.xlsx - TABELE
- število spremenljivk: 0
- število enot: 0
Licenca: cc0
Verzija: 16. september 2019
Spremenljivke
ID_REF Identification code of the reference
Identification code of the reference
| Vrednost 13 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1 | |
| 002 | 1 | |
| 003 | 1 | |
| 004 | 1 | |
| 005 | 1 | |
| 006 | 1 | |
| 007 | 1 | |
| 008 | 1 | |
| 009 | 1 | |
| 010 | 1 | |
| 011 | 1 | |
| 012 | 1 | |
| 013 | 1 | |
| 014 | 1 | |
| 015 | 1 | |
| 016 | 1 | |
| 017 | 1 | |
| 018 | 1 | |
| 019 | 1 | |
| 020 | 1 | |
| 021 | 1 | |
| 022 | 1 | |
| 023 | 1 | |
| 024 | 1 | |
| 025 | 1 | |
| 026 | 1 | |
| 027 | 1 | |
| 028 | 1 | |
| 029 | 1 | |
| 030 | 1 | |
| 031 | 1 | |
| 032 | 1 | |
| 033 | 1 | |
| 034 | 1 | |
| 035 | 1 | |
| 036 | 1 | |
| 037 | 1 | |
| 038 | 1 | |
| 039 | 1 | |
| 040 | 1 | |
| 041 | 1 | |
| 042 | 1 | |
| 043 | 1 | |
| 044 | 1 | |
| 045 | 1 | |
| 046 | 1 | |
| 047 | 1 | |
| 048 | 1 | |
| 049 | 1 | |
| 050 | 1 | |
| 051 | 1 | |
| 052 | 1 | |
| 053 | 1 | |
| 054 | 1 | |
| 055 | 1 | |
| 056 | 1 | |
| 057 | 1 | |
| 058 | 1 | |
| 059 | 1 | |
| 060 | 1 | |
| 061 | 1 | |
| 062 | 1 | |
| 063 | 1 | |
| 064 | 1 | |
| 065 | 1 | |
| 066 | 1 | |
| 067 | 1 | |
| 068 | 1 | |
| 069 | 1 | |
| 070 | 1 | |
| 071 | 1 | |
| 072 | 1 | |
| 073 | 1 | |
| 074 | 1 | |
| Veljavni odgovori | Neveljavni odgovori | Minimum | Maksimum | Aritmetična sredina | Standardni odklon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 0 |
TITLE Title of the reference
Title of the reference
| Vrednost 22 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| A Comparison of Different Online Sampling Approaches for Generating National Samples | 1 | |
| A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe | 1 | |
| A Comparison of the Quality of Questions in a Face-to-face and a Web Survey | 1 | |
| A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples | 1 | |
| Accuracy of Estimates in Access Panel Based Surveys (in Improving survey methods) | 1 | |
| An empirical test of the impact of smartphones on panel-based online data collection (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Assessing representativeness of a probability-based online panel in Germany (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Attention and Usability in Internet Surveys: Effects of Visual Feedback in Grid Questions (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Attitudes Toward Risk and Informed Consent for Research on Medical Practices: A Cross-Sectional Survey | 1 | |
| Can Biomarkers Be Collected in an Internet Survey? A Pilot Study in the LISS Panel (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Can a non-probabilistic online panel achieve question quality similar to that of the European Social Survey? | 1 | |
| Challenges in Reaching Hard-to-Reach Groups in Internet Panel Research (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Comparing Survey Results Obtained via Mobile Devices and Computers: An Experiment With a Mobile Web Survey on a Heterogeneous Group of Mobile Devices Versus a Computer-Assisted Web Survey | 1 | |
| Comparison of Smartphone and Online Computer Survey Administration | 1 | |
| Comparison of US Panel Vendors for Online Surveys | 1 | |
| Comparison of telephone RDD and online panel survey modes on CPGI scores and co-morbidities | 1 | |
| Correcting for non-response bias in contingent valuation surveys concerning environmental non-market goods: an empirical investigation using an online panel | 1 | |
| Data Quality in PC and Mobile Web Surveys | 1 | |
| Determinants of the starting rate and the completion rate in online panel studies (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Does It Pay Off to Include Non-Internet Households in an Internet Panel? | 1 | |
| Does the Inclusion of Non-Internet Households in a Web Panel Reduce Coverage Bias? | 1 | |
| Effects of Lotteries on Response Behavior in Online Panels | 1 | |
| Efficiency of Different Recruitment Strategies for Web Panels | 1 | |
| Estimating the effects of nonresponses in online panels through imputation (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study | 1 | |
| Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for public participation geographic information systems surveys | 1 | |
| How Do Lotteries and Study Results Influence Response Behavior in Online Panels? | 1 | |
| How Representative Are Online Panels? Problems of Coverage and Selection and Possible Solutions (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Improving Response Rates and Questionnaire Design for Mobile Web Surveys | 1 | |
| Improving Survey Response Rates in Online Panels: Effects of Low-Cost Incentives and Cost-Free Text Appeal Interventions | 1 | |
| Improving web survey quality: Potentials and constraints of propensity score adjustments (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Informing panel members about study results: Effects of traditional and innovative forms of feedback on participation (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Internet panels, professional respondents, and data quality | 1 | |
| Lotteries and study results in market research online panels | 1 | |
| Making Mobile Browser Surveys Smarter Results from a Randomized Experiment Comparing Online Surveys Completed via Computer or Smartphone | 1 | |
| Measurement invariance and quality of composite scores in a face-to-face and a web survey | 1 | |
| Measuring Attitudes Toward Controversial Issues in Internet Surveys: Order Effects of Open and Closed Questioning (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Mobile Response in Web Panels | 1 | |
| Mode System Effects in an Online Panel Study: Comparing a Probability-based Online Panel with two Face-to-Face Reference Surveys | 1 | |
| Motives for joining nonprobability online panels and their association with survey participation behavior (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Nonprobability Web Surveys to Measure Sexual Behaviors and Attitudes in the General Population: A Comparison With a Probability Sample Interview Survey | 1 | |
| Nonresponse and attrition in a probability-based online panel for the general population (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Nonresponse and measurement error in an online panel: Does additional effort to recruit reluctant respondents result in poorer quality data? (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Online panels and validity: Representativeness and attrition in the Finnish eOpinion panel (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Panel Attrition - Separating Stayers, Fast Attriters, Gradual Attriters, and Lurkers | 1 | |
| Panel Conditioning in Difficult Attitudinal Questions | 1 | |
| Professional respondents in nonprobability online panels (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Recruiting A Probability Sample For An Online Panel: Effects Of Contact Mode, Incentives, And Information | 1 | |
| Recruiting an Internet Panel Using Respondent-Driven Sampling | 1 | |
| Respondent Conditioning in Online Panel Surveys: Results of Two Field Experiments | 1 | |
| Respondent Screening and Revealed Preference Axioms: Testing Quarantining Methods for Enhanced Data Quality in Web Panel Survey | 1 | |
| Response Behavior in an Adaptive Survey Design for the Setting-Up Stage of a Probability-Based Access Panel in Germany (in Improving survey methods) | 1 | |
| Sample composition discrepancies in different stages of a probability-based online panel | 1 | |
| Selection bias of internet panel surveys: A comparison with a paper-based survey and national governmental statistics in Japan | 1 | |
| Sensitive topics in PC Web and mobile web surveys: Is there a difference? | 1 | |
| Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population The German Internet Panel | 1 | |
| Straightlining in Web survey panels over time | 1 | |
| Survey Mode Effects on Data Quality: Comparison of Web and Mail Modes in a U.S. National Panel Survey | 1 | |
| Survey Participation in a Probability-Based Internet Panel in the Netherlands (in Improving survey methods) | 1 | |
| Surveying Rare Populations Using a Probability based Online Panel | 1 | |
| The Access Panel of German Official Statistics as a Selection Frame (in Improving survey methods) | 1 | |
| The Design of Grids in Web Surveys | 1 | |
| The Effects of Questionnaire Completion Using Mobile Devices on Data Quality. Evidence from a Probability-based General Population Panel | 1 | |
| The Utility of an Online Convenience Panel for Reaching Rare and Dispersed Populations | 1 | |
| The comparison of road safety survey answers between web-panel and face-to-face; Dutch results of SARTRE-4 survey | 1 | |
| The impact of speeding on data quality in nonprobability and freshly recruited probability-based online panels (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| The relationship between nonresponse strategies and measurement error: Comparing online panel surveys to traditional surveys (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| The role of topic interest and topic salience in online panel web surveys. | 1 | |
| The untold story of multi-mode (online and mail) consumer panels: From optimal recruitment to retention and attrition (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| The use of Pcs, smartphones and tablets in a probability based panel survey. Effects on survey measurement error. | 1 | |
| Using Interactive Features to Motivate and Probe Responses to Open-Ended Questions (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Validating respondents’ identity in online samples: The impact of efforts to eliminate fraudulent respondents (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| What Happens if You Offer a Mobile Option to Your Web Panel? Evidence From a Probability-Based Panel of Internet Users | 1 | |
| What do web survey panel respondents answer when asked "Do you have any other comment?" | 1 | |
| Veljavni odgovori | Neveljavni odgovori | Minimum | Maksimum | Aritmetična sredina | Standardni odklon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 |
EDITOR Editor of the reference
Editor of the reference
| Vrednost 31 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| Annals of Internal Medicine 162 (10) | 1 | |
| Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health | 1 | |
| Center for Crime and Justice Policy, CCJP 1 | 1 | |
| Field Methods, 26, 4 | 1 | |
| Field Methods, 27, 4. pp. 391-408 | 1 | |
| Field Methods, Published online before print February 21, 2013 | 1 | |
| Field Methods, Published online before print January 29, 2013 | 1 | |
| International Gambling Studies | 1 | |
| International Journal of Internet Science, 8, 1, p. 17-29 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Market Research, 55, 1, pp. 59-80 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Market Research, 55, 5, pp. 611-616 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Market Research, 57, 3, pp. 395-412 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 2, pp. 238-249 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 4, pp. 534-545 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 2, pp. 242-253 | 1 | |
| JMIR Publications, 15, 11 | 1 | |
| Journal of Business Research, 69, 8, pp. 3139-3148 | 1 | |
| Journal of Environmental Planning and Management | 1 | |
| Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, 12, e276 | 1 | |
| Journal of Official Statistics, 30, 2, pp. 291-310 | 1 | |
| Journal of Safety Research, 46, pp. 13-20 | 1 | |
| Methodology, 11, 3, pp. 81-88 | 1 | |
| PLOS one, 10, 12 | 1 | |
| Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ), 76, 3, pp. 470-490 | 1 | |
| Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ), 79, 3, pp. 687-709 | 1 | |
| Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ), First published online: November 14, 2014 | 1 | |
| Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ), First published online: September 16, 2013 (77, 3, pp. 783-797) | 1 | |
| Routledge | 10 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 30, 2, pp. 212-228 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 31, 3, p. 322-345 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 31, 3, pp. 371-385 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 31, 4, p. 482-504 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 31, 6, p. 725-743 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 32 no. 2, pp. 238-255 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 32, 4, 544-560 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 32, 6, pp. 728-742 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 34, 1, 2016, pp. 8-25, Published online before print March 31, 2015 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 34, 1, pp. 41-58 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 34, 1, pp. 99-115 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 34, 2, pp. 229-243, Published online before print December 17, 2014 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, vol. 34, 1: pp. 78-94. First Published February 26, 2015. | 1 | |
| Sociological Methods & Research | 1 | |
| Survey Methods: Insights from the field | 1 | |
| Survey Practice, 5, 3 | 1 | |
| Survey Research Methods, 7, 1, pp. 17-28 | 1 | |
| Survey Research Methods, 7, 3 | 1 | |
| Survey Research Methods, 9, 2, pp. 125-137 | 1 | |
| Wiley | 15 | |
| methods, data, analyses | 1 | |
| methods, data, analyses, 9, 1, pp.87-110 | 1 | |
| methods, data, analyses, 9, 2, pp. 185-212 | 1 | |
| Veljavni odgovori | Neveljavni odgovori | Minimum | Maksimum | Aritmetična sredina | Standardni odklon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 0 |
ID_REF Identification code of the reference
Identification code of the reference
| Vrednost 188 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1 | |
| 002 | 1 | |
| 003 | 1 | |
| 004 | 1 | |
| 005 | 1 | |
| 006 | 1 | |
| 007 | 1 | |
| 008 | 1 | |
| 009 | 1 | |
| 010 | 1 | |
| 011 | 1 | |
| 012 | 1 | |
| 013 | 1 | |
| 014 | 1 | |
| 015 | 1 | |
| 016 | 1 | |
| 017 | 1 | |
| 018 | 1 | |
| 019 | 1 | |
| 020 | 1 | |
| 021 | 1 | |
| 022 | 1 | |
| 023 | 1 | |
| 024 | 1 | |
| 025 | 1 | |
| 026 | 1 | |
| 027 | 1 | |
| 028 | 1 | |
| 029 | 1 | |
| 030 | 1 | |
| 031 | 1 | |
| 032 | 1 | |
| 033 | 1 | |
| 034 | 1 | |
| 035 | 1 | |
| 036 | 1 | |
| 037 | 1 | |
| 038 | 1 | |
| 039 | 1 | |
| 040 | 1 | |
| 041 | 1 | |
| 042 | 1 | |
| 043 | 1 | |
| 044 | 1 | |
| 045 | 1 | |
| 046 | 1 | |
| 047 | 1 | |
| 048 | 1 | |
| 049 | 1 | |
| 050 | 1 | |
| 051 | 1 | |
| 052 | 1 | |
| 053 | 1 | |
| 054 | 1 | |
| 055 | 1 | |
| 056 | 1 | |
| 057 | 1 | |
| 058 | 1 | |
| 059 | 1 | |
| 060 | 1 | |
| 061 | 1 | |
| 062 | 1 | |
| 063 | 1 | |
| 064 | 1 | |
| 065 | 1 | |
| 066 | 1 | |
| 067 | 1 | |
| 068 | 1 | |
| 069 | 1 | |
| 070 | 1 | |
| 071 | 1 | |
| 072 | 1 | |
| 073 | 1 | |
| 074 | 1 | |
| Veljavni odgovori | Neveljavni odgovori | Minimum | Maksimum | Aritmetična sredina | Standardni odklon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 0 |
TITLE Title of the reference
Title of the reference
| Vrednost 287 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| A Comparison of Different Online Sampling Approaches for Generating National Samples | 1 | |
| A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe | 1 | |
| A Comparison of the Quality of Questions in a Face-to-face and a Web Survey | 1 | |
| A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples | 1 | |
| Accuracy of Estimates in Access Panel Based Surveys (in Improving survey methods) | 1 | |
| An empirical test of the impact of smartphones on panel-based online data collection (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Assessing representativeness of a probability-based online panel in Germany (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Attention and Usability in Internet Surveys: Effects of Visual Feedback in Grid Questions (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Attitudes Toward Risk and Informed Consent for Research on Medical Practices: A Cross-Sectional Survey | 1 | |
| Can Biomarkers Be Collected in an Internet Survey? A Pilot Study in the LISS Panel (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Can a non-probabilistic online panel achieve question quality similar to that of the European Social Survey? | 1 | |
| Challenges in Reaching Hard-to-Reach Groups in Internet Panel Research (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Comparing Survey Results Obtained via Mobile Devices and Computers: An Experiment With a Mobile Web Survey on a Heterogeneous Group of Mobile Devices Versus a Computer-Assisted Web Survey | 1 | |
| Comparison of Smartphone and Online Computer Survey Administration | 1 | |
| Comparison of US Panel Vendors for Online Surveys | 1 | |
| Comparison of telephone RDD and online panel survey modes on CPGI scores and co-morbidities | 1 | |
| Correcting for non-response bias in contingent valuation surveys concerning environmental non-market goods: an empirical investigation using an online panel | 1 | |
| Data Quality in PC and Mobile Web Surveys | 1 | |
| Determinants of the starting rate and the completion rate in online panel studies (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Does It Pay Off to Include Non-Internet Households in an Internet Panel? | 1 | |
| Does the Inclusion of Non-Internet Households in a Web Panel Reduce Coverage Bias? | 1 | |
| Effects of Lotteries on Response Behavior in Online Panels | 1 | |
| Efficiency of Different Recruitment Strategies for Web Panels | 1 | |
| Estimating the effects of nonresponses in online panels through imputation (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Evaluation of an Adapted Design in a Multi-device Online Panel: A DemoSCOPE Case Study | 1 | |
| Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for public participation geographic information systems surveys | 1 | |
| How Do Lotteries and Study Results Influence Response Behavior in Online Panels? | 1 | |
| How Representative Are Online Panels? Problems of Coverage and Selection and Possible Solutions (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Improving Response Rates and Questionnaire Design for Mobile Web Surveys | 1 | |
| Improving Survey Response Rates in Online Panels: Effects of Low-Cost Incentives and Cost-Free Text Appeal Interventions | 1 | |
| Improving web survey quality: Potentials and constraints of propensity score adjustments (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Informing panel members about study results: Effects of traditional and innovative forms of feedback on participation (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Internet panels, professional respondents, and data quality | 1 | |
| Lotteries and study results in market research online panels | 1 | |
| Making Mobile Browser Surveys Smarter Results from a Randomized Experiment Comparing Online Surveys Completed via Computer or Smartphone | 1 | |
| Measurement invariance and quality of composite scores in a face-to-face and a web survey | 1 | |
| Measuring Attitudes Toward Controversial Issues in Internet Surveys: Order Effects of Open and Closed Questioning (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Mobile Response in Web Panels | 1 | |
| Mode System Effects in an Online Panel Study: Comparing a Probability-based Online Panel with two Face-to-Face Reference Surveys | 1 | |
| Motives for joining nonprobability online panels and their association with survey participation behavior (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Nonprobability Web Surveys to Measure Sexual Behaviors and Attitudes in the General Population: A Comparison With a Probability Sample Interview Survey | 1 | |
| Nonresponse and attrition in a probability-based online panel for the general population (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Nonresponse and measurement error in an online panel: Does additional effort to recruit reluctant respondents result in poorer quality data? (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Online panels and validity: Representativeness and attrition in the Finnish eOpinion panel (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Panel Attrition - Separating Stayers, Fast Attriters, Gradual Attriters, and Lurkers | 1 | |
| Panel Conditioning in Difficult Attitudinal Questions | 1 | |
| Professional respondents in nonprobability online panels (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| Recruiting A Probability Sample For An Online Panel: Effects Of Contact Mode, Incentives, And Information | 1 | |
| Recruiting an Internet Panel Using Respondent-Driven Sampling | 1 | |
| Respondent Conditioning in Online Panel Surveys: Results of Two Field Experiments | 1 | |
| Respondent Screening and Revealed Preference Axioms: Testing Quarantining Methods for Enhanced Data Quality in Web Panel Survey | 1 | |
| Response Behavior in an Adaptive Survey Design for the Setting-Up Stage of a Probability-Based Access Panel in Germany (in Improving survey methods) | 1 | |
| Sample composition discrepancies in different stages of a probability-based online panel | 1 | |
| Selection bias of internet panel surveys: A comparison with a paper-based survey and national governmental statistics in Japan | 1 | |
| Sensitive topics in PC Web and mobile web surveys: Is there a difference? | 1 | |
| Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population The German Internet Panel | 1 | |
| Straightlining in Web survey panels over time | 1 | |
| Survey Mode Effects on Data Quality: Comparison of Web and Mail Modes in a U.S. National Panel Survey | 1 | |
| Survey Participation in a Probability-Based Internet Panel in the Netherlands (in Improving survey methods) | 1 | |
| Surveying Rare Populations Using a Probability based Online Panel | 1 | |
| The Access Panel of German Official Statistics as a Selection Frame (in Improving survey methods) | 1 | |
| The Design of Grids in Web Surveys | 1 | |
| The Effects of Questionnaire Completion Using Mobile Devices on Data Quality. Evidence from a Probability-based General Population Panel | 1 | |
| The Utility of an Online Convenience Panel for Reaching Rare and Dispersed Populations | 1 | |
| The comparison of road safety survey answers between web-panel and face-to-face; Dutch results of SARTRE-4 survey | 1 | |
| The impact of speeding on data quality in nonprobability and freshly recruited probability-based online panels (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| The relationship between nonresponse strategies and measurement error: Comparing online panel surveys to traditional surveys (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| The role of topic interest and topic salience in online panel web surveys. | 1 | |
| The untold story of multi-mode (online and mail) consumer panels: From optimal recruitment to retention and attrition (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| The use of Pcs, smartphones and tablets in a probability based panel survey. Effects on survey measurement error. | 1 | |
| Using Interactive Features to Motivate and Probe Responses to Open-Ended Questions (in Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies) | 1 | |
| Validating respondents’ identity in online samples: The impact of efforts to eliminate fraudulent respondents (in Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective) | 1 | |
| What Happens if You Offer a Mobile Option to Your Web Panel? Evidence From a Probability-Based Panel of Internet Users | 1 | |
| What do web survey panel respondents answer when asked "Do you have any other comment?" | 1 | |
| Veljavni odgovori | Neveljavni odgovori | Minimum | Maksimum | Aritmetična sredina | Standardni odklon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 |
EDITOR Editor of the reference
Editor of the reference
| Vrednost 386 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| Annals of Internal Medicine 162 (10) | 1 | |
| Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health | 1 | |
| Center for Crime and Justice Policy, CCJP 1 | 1 | |
| Field Methods, 26, 4 | 1 | |
| Field Methods, 27, 4. pp. 391-408 | 1 | |
| Field Methods, Published online before print February 21, 2013 | 1 | |
| Field Methods, Published online before print January 29, 2013 | 1 | |
| International Gambling Studies | 1 | |
| International Journal of Internet Science, 8, 1, p. 17-29 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Market Research, 55, 1, pp. 59-80 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Market Research, 55, 5, pp. 611-616 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Market Research, 57, 3, pp. 395-412 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 2, pp. 238-249 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 4, pp. 534-545 | 1 | |
| International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 2, pp. 242-253 | 1 | |
| JMIR Publications, 15, 11 | 1 | |
| Journal of Business Research, 69, 8, pp. 3139-3148 | 1 | |
| Journal of Environmental Planning and Management | 1 | |
| Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, 12, e276 | 1 | |
| Journal of Official Statistics, 30, 2, pp. 291-310 | 1 | |
| Journal of Safety Research, 46, pp. 13-20 | 1 | |
| Methodology, 11, 3, pp. 81-88 | 1 | |
| PLOS one, 10, 12 | 1 | |
| Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ), 76, 3, pp. 470-490 | 1 | |
| Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ), 79, 3, pp. 687-709 | 1 | |
| Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ), First published online: November 14, 2014 | 1 | |
| Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ), First published online: September 16, 2013 (77, 3, pp. 783-797) | 1 | |
| Routledge | 10 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 30, 2, pp. 212-228 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 31, 3, p. 322-345 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 31, 3, pp. 371-385 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 31, 4, p. 482-504 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 31, 6, p. 725-743 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 32 no. 2, pp. 238-255 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 32, 4, 544-560 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 32, 6, pp. 728-742 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 34, 1, 2016, pp. 8-25, Published online before print March 31, 2015 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 34, 1, pp. 41-58 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 34, 1, pp. 99-115 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, 34, 2, pp. 229-243, Published online before print December 17, 2014 | 1 | |
| Social Science Computer Review, vol. 34, 1: pp. 78-94. First Published February 26, 2015. | 1 | |
| Sociological Methods & Research | 1 | |
| Survey Methods: Insights from the field | 1 | |
| Survey Practice, 5, 3 | 1 | |
| Survey Research Methods, 7, 1, pp. 17-28 | 1 | |
| Survey Research Methods, 7, 3 | 1 | |
| Survey Research Methods, 9, 2, pp. 125-137 | 1 | |
| Wiley | 15 | |
| methods, data, analyses | 1 | |
| methods, data, analyses, 9, 1, pp.87-110 | 1 | |
| methods, data, analyses, 9, 2, pp. 185-212 | 1 | |
| Veljavni odgovori | Neveljavni odgovori | Minimum | Maksimum | Aritmetična sredina | Standardni odklon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 0 |
AUTHOR Author of the reference
Author of the reference
| Vrednost 485 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| Arn, B.; Klug, S.; Kolodziejski, J. | 1 | |
| Avendano, M., Scherpenzeel, A. C., Mackenbach, J. P. | 1 | |
| Baker, R., Miller, C., Kachhi, D., Lange, K., Wilding-Brown, L., Tucker, J. | 1 | |
| Binswanger, J., Schunk, D., Toepoel, V. | 1 | |
| Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A-S., Das, M., Douhou, S., Krieger, U. | 1 | |
| Blom, A. G.; Gathmann, C.; Krieger, U. | 1 | |
| Bonnichsen, O.; Boye Olsen, S. | 1 | |
| Bosnjak, M., Haas, I., Galesic, M., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P. | 1 | |
| Bosnjak, M.; Struminskaya, B.; Weyandt, K. | 1 | |
| Brown, G., Weber, D., Zanon, D., de Bie, K. | 1 | |
| Buskirk, T. D., Andrus, C. | 1 | |
| Cella, D., Craig, B. M., Hays, R. D., Pickard, A. S., Reeve, B. B., Revicki, D. A. | 1 | |
| Cho, Mildred K., David Magnus, Melissa Constantine, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Maureen Kelley, Stephanie Alessi, Diane Korngiebel, et al. | 1 | |
| Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., Zhang, C. | 1 | |
| Drewes, F. | 1 | |
| Eckman, S. | 1 | |
| Enderle, T., and Münnich, R. | 1 | |
| Engel, U. | 1 | |
| Erens, B.; Burkill, S.; Couper, M. P.; C., Clifton, S., Tanton, C., Phelps, A., Datta, J., Mercer, C. H., Sonnenberg, P., Prah, P., Mitchell, K. R., Wellings, K., Johnson, Anne M., Copas, A.Conrad, F. C. | 1 | |
| Ester, P., Vinken, H. | 1 | |
| Goeritz, A., Luthe, S. C. | 3 | |
| Golden, L.; Albaum, G.; Roster, C. A.; Smith, S. M. | 1 | |
| Goldenbeld, C., de Craen, S. | 1 | |
| Greszki, R., Meyer, M., Schoen, H. | 1 | |
| Grönlund, K., Strandberg, K. | 1 | |
| Göritz, A. S. | 1 | |
| Hansen, K. M., Pedersen, R. T. | 1 | |
| Heen, Miliaikeala SJ, Joel D. Lieberman, and Terance D. Miethe | 1 | |
| Hillygus, D. S., Jackson, N., Young, M. | 1 | |
| Jones, M. S.; House, L. A.; Zhifeng, G. | 1 | |
| Kaczmirek, L. | 1 | |
| Keusch, F. | 1 | |
| Keusch, F., Batinic, B., Mayerhofer, W. | 1 | |
| Lee, C.-K.; Back, K.-J.; Williams, Ro. J.; Ahn, S.-S. | 1 | |
| Leenheer, J., Scherpenzeel, A. | 1 | |
| Lugtig, P. J. | 1 | |
| Lugtig, P., Das, M., Scherpenzeel, A. | 1 | |
| Malhotra, N., Miller, J. M., Wedeking, J. | 1 | |
| Matthijsse, S.M., de Leeuw, E.D., & Hox, J.J. | 1 | |
| Mavletova, A. M. | 1 | |
| Mavletova, A. M., Couper, M. P. | 1 | |
| McCutcheon, A. L., Rao, K., Kaminska, O. | 1 | |
| Oudejans, M., Christian, L. M.0 | 1 | |
| Pedersen, M. J.; Nielsen, C. V. | 1 | |
| Peugh, J., Wright, G. | 1 | |
| Rendtel, U., and Amarov, B. | 1 | |
| Revilla, M. | 1 | |
| Revilla, M., Saris, W. E. | 1 | |
| Revilla, M.; Saris, W. E.; Loewe, G.; Ochoa, C. | 1 | |
| Roberts, C., Allum, N., Sturgis, P. | 1 | |
| Scherpenzeel, A. C. | 1 | |
| Scherpenzeel, A. C., Bethlehem, J. G. | 1 | |
| Scherpenzeel, A., Toepoel, V. | 2 | |
| Schonlau, M. | 1 | |
| Schonlau, M., Weidmer, B., Kapteyn, A. | 1 | |
| Sell, R.; Goldberg, S.; Conron, K. | 1 | |
| Shin, E., Johnson, T. P., Rao, K. | 1 | |
| Steinmetz, S., Bianchi, A., Tijdens, K., Biffignandi, S. | 1 | |
| Struminskaya, B. | 1 | |
| Struminskaya, B., Kaczmirek, L., Schaurer, I., Bandilla W. | 1 | |
| Struminskaya, B.; de Leeuw, E. D.; Kaczmirek, L. | 1 | |
| Toepoel, V., Lugtig, P. J. | 1 | |
| Toepoel, V.; Lugtig, P. J. | 1 | |
| Toepoel, V.; Schonlau, M. | 1 | |
| Tsuboi, S., Yoshida, H., Ae, R., Kojo, T., Nakamura, Y., Kitamura, K. | 1 | |
| Vis, C. M., Marchand, M. A. G. | 1 | |
| Wells, T., Bailey, J., Link, M. W. | 1 | |
| Zhang, W. | 1 | |
| de Bruijne, M., Wijnant, A. | 3 | |
| Veljavni odgovori | Neveljavni odgovori | Minimum | Maksimum | Aritmetična sredina | Standardni odklon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 |
YEAR Year of the reference
Year of the reference
| Vrednost 584 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 6 | |
| 2012 | 5 | |
| 2013 | 15 | |
| 2014 | 28 | |
| 2015 | 14 | |
| 2016 | 6 | |
| Veljavni odgovori | Neveljavni odgovori | Minimum | Maksimum | Aritmetična sredina | Standardni odklon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 0 |
Vrednosti spremenljivk od 2011 do 2016
COUNT_ST Country of the study
Country of the study
| Vrednost 683 | Frekvenca | |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | |